(1) The period of probation is the final stage of the recruitment and selection process. A probationary period is established to identify and support an appropriate match between the person, the position and the work environment. Successful probation requires both the staff member and the nominated supervisor over the established period of time to be satisfied with the match of the staff member’s qualifications, skills, abilities and development and the needs of the position. (2) The ACU Staff Enterprise Agreement 2022-2025 sets out the arrangements which apply to the probation process for fixed-term academic staff and these are supplemented by this Policy. The probation process is conducted in conjunction with the Progress Plan for Academic Staff Policy and is informed by the Academic Performance Matrices and Evidence (APME) Framework and the Capability Development Framework (CDF). (3) The following terms have specific meanings in this Policy: (4) An Academic Staff member, other than a casual appointee, may be employed on the basis of a requirement to complete satisfactorily a specified reasonable period of probationary employment that is directly related to the nature of the work performed. (5) The requirement to complete a probationary period will normally be a condition within offers of continuing and fixed-term employment. (6) The terms of an Academic Staff member’s probationary period shall be advised in writing to the staff member in advance of the commencement of employment via the letter of offer of employment. The terms will include the period of probation and the probation criteria which must be achieved during probation. For staff appointed on a fixed-term basis: (7) An Academic Staff member cannot normally be required to serve more than one period of probation with the University. A second or subsequent fixed-term contract with the University cannot contain a period of probation. (8) In accordance with the Leave Without Pay Policy, periods of leave without pay exceeding twenty (20) working days, whether continuous or aggregated, will not count as service towards a probationary period for a fixed-term staff member. The period of probation will be extended by a period equivalent to the leave without pay up to the maximum probation period of twelve (12) months. (9) The performance of an Academic Staff member, including in relation to the achievement of probation criteria, will be monitored and managed during the probation period as part of the Progress Plan for Academic Staff process. The performance of an Academic Staff member will normally be reviewed at the mid-point and prior to the end of the probation period. (10) The potential outcomes during probation are normally as follows: (11) For the purposes of this Policy, unsatisfactory performance includes behaviour of a kind described in Regulation 1.07 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (refer to Attachment 1: MidPoint Probation Review Process [Fixed-term]). (12) The purpose of this Policy is to set out the process and procedures which apply to probation for Academic Staff appointed on a fixed-term basis. The Policy also outlines the role and responsibilities of each of the following in the process and procedures: (13) This Policy applies to all Academic Staff employed at ACU who are appointed on a fixed-term basis who are required to serve a probationary period. (14) All approvals of decisions made must be in accordance with the relevant University Delegations of Authority Policy and Register. (15) Probation criteria set out the expectations that the Academic Staff member will need to meet in order to achieve confirmation of their fixed-term appointment. Probation criteria will include essential and specific probation criteria. (16) The probation criteria for fixed-term academic positions will normally be determined as part of a recruitment and selection process and advised to People and Capability via the completion and authorisation of an Academic Staff Probation Period and Criteria Form. (17) The period of probation of an Academic Staff member will be determined as part of the selection and appointment process based on the following options: (18) The recommended probation period will be set out on the Academic Staff Probation Period and Criteria Form. (19) The approved probation criteria and period as set out in the Academic Staff Probation Period and Criteria Form will be included in the letter of offer of employment to the Academic Staff member. Once the letter of offer containing the terms of probation is signed by the Academic Staff member, it cannot be changed except through mutual agreement between the University and the staff member to a variation to the letter of offer. (20) A change to an Academic Staff member’s specific probation criteria may be appropriate following: (21) The following process will apply to changing the terms (criteria and/or period) of probation: (22) This process does not apply to the reduction of a period of probation which occurs as a result of: (23) During the period of probation, the Academic Staff member will participate in the ongoing Progress Plan for Academic Staff process. This process provides the framework for monitoring and reviewing the Academic Staff member’s performance in particular against the probation criteria specified in their offer of employment. (24) The Progress Plan is continuous for the duration of employment. It commences at the time of appointment with the University. (25) Following commencement, Progress Plan conversations will begin between the Academic Staff member and nominated supervisor to: (26) The Progress Plan can be utilised to outline and record any development plans associated with the staff member’s probation. (27) In accordance with the Progress Plan for Academic Staff Policy, regular formal or informal conversations should occur, which may be initiated by the nominated supervisor or the Academic Staff member. During these conversations any probation related concerns should be raised, discussed and documented. (28) In accordance with the Progress Plan for Academic Staff Policy, regular formal or informal conversations should occur, which may be initiated by the nominated supervisor or the Academic Staff member. During these conversations any probation related concerns should be raised, discussed and documented. (29) The purpose of Mid-Point and Final Probation Reviews is to assess performance against the essential and specific probation criteria specified in the offer of employment. (30) The Probation Reviews will normally be conducted before the mid-point (Mid-Point Probation Review) and end of the probation period (Final Probation Review). The latter will occur prior to and normally no later than two (2) months before the end the period of probation (31) The process for Probation Reviews is summarised in Attachment 1: MidPoint Probation Review Process [Fixed-term] and Attachment 2: Final Probation Review Process [Fixed-term]. (32) The following will be completed and normally be signed by both the Academic Staff member and their nominated supervisor: (33) During these reviews, the following will be discussed and documented: (34) In circumstances where satisfactory progress towards or completion of a qualification is a probationary criterion, the Academic Staff member will be expected to provide evidence of their enrolment and progress (for example, a report from their research higher degree supervisor concerning progress and anticipated completion or evidence of submission of thesis). The Academic Staff member may be required to give their permission for further information to be obtained directly from relevant officers within the institution in which the qualification is being undertaken, if requested to do so by the nominated supervisor. (35) Based on the information gathered during the Probation Reviews the nominated supervisor may form a view that: (36) Nothing in this Policy prevents early confirmation as an outcome of a Probation Review process. The relevant Member of the Senior Executive is authorised to approve early confirmation of the staff member’s fixed-term appointment. (37) The revision table includes revisions up until this document was migrated into the current policy platform. Any later changes will show in the Status and Details tab. (38) The University may make changes to this Policy from time to time. In this regard, any staff member who wishes to make any comments about this Policy may forward their suggestions to People and Capability. Unless otherwise indicated, this policy will still apply beyond the review date. (39) Any staff member who requires assistance in understanding this Policy should first consult their nominated supervisor who is responsible for the implementation and operation of these arrangements in their work area. Should further information or advice be required staff should visit Service Central. (40) For related legislation, policies, procedures and guidelines and any supporting resources please refer to the Associated Information tab.Probation for Fixed Term Academic Staff Policy
Section 1 - Background Information
Section 2 - Definitions
Top of Page
Term
Definition
The Agreement
Refers to the ACU Staff Enterprise Agreement 2022-2025.
Refers to the person appointed to the position of Executive Dean of a Faculty or the equivalent member of the Executive for non-Faculty units.
National Head of School (or equivalent)
Refers to the person appointed to the position of National Head of School or an equivalent line management position(s) within a Faculty or non-Faculty.
Section 3 - Policy Statement
Section 4 - Policy Purpose
Top of PageSection 5 - Application of Policy
Section 6 - Approvals
Section 7 - Procedures
Part A - Probation Criteria
Part B - Probation Period
Part C - Changing probation terms during the period of probation
Part D - Probation Feedback and Reviews
Progress Plan for Academic Staff
Performance Review
Progress Reviews
Mid-Point and Final Probation Reviews
Section 8 - Revisions Made to This Policy
Date
Major, Minor or Editorial
Description
19 December 2016
Major
Updated to incorporate changes following a comprehensive review of probation process and integrates the Academic Performance Matrices and Evidence Framework.
16 April 2019
Editorial
Updated to include title change to ACU Staff Enterprise Agreement 2017-2021.
21 January 2021
Minor
Policy has been reviewed and updated to reflect the Progress Plan process, the University's new performance review and planning process.
Section 9 - Further Assistance
Section 10 - Additional Information
View Document
This is the current version of this document. You can provide feedback on this document to the document author - refer to the Status and Details on the document's navigation bar.
Executive Dean (or equivalent)
[1] Examples of evidence can be found in the Academic Performance Matrices and Evidence Framework.
[2] The Capability Development Framework and the Academic Performance Matrices and Evidence Framework can assist in identifying professional development needs.
Timing
Process and Documentation
[3] Examples of evidence can be found in the Academic Performance Matrices and Evidence Framework.
Potential Outcomes of Probation Reviews
Performance is satisfactory. The nominated supervisor will then inform the Academic Staff member of this.
For a Final Probation Review, the nominated supervisor will recommend confirmation to the National Head of School (or equivalent) and then Executive Dean (or equivalent). The Executive Dean (or equivalent) is authorised to approve confirmation of the staff member’s fixed-term appointment.
The Academic Staff member is at risk of not achieving their probation criteria by the end of the probationary period and/or their performance is unsatisfactory. The nominated supervisor will inform the National Head of School (or equivalent) and Executive Dean (or equivalent) one or both of whom may request further information.
For a Mid-Point Probation Review the Executive Dean (or equivalent) may:
For a Final Probation Review: The Executive Dean (or equivalent) may make a recommendation for non-confirmation of appointment to the relevant Member of the Senior Executive for appropriate action in accordance with the Agreement.
Where a recommendation for non-confirmation of appointment is made, the staff member will be advised of, and given an opportunity to respond to, any adverse material that will be taken into account by the Member of the Senior Executive.