(1) A probationary period is established to identify and support an appropriate match between the person, the position and the work environment. Successful probation requires both the staff member and the nominated supervisor over the established period of time to be satisfied with the match of the staff member’s qualifications, skills, abilities and development and the needs of the position. (2) The ACU Staff Enterprise Agreement 2022-2025 sets out arrangements which apply to the probation process and these are supplemented by this Policy. (3) This Policy sets out the process and procedures which apply to probation for Academic Staff appointed on a continuing basis. The Policy also outlines the role and responsibilities of each of the following in the process and procedures: (4) The probation process is conducted in conjunction with the Progress Plan for Academic Staff Policy. (5) This policy applies to all Academic Staff employed at ACU who are appointed to a continuing position and are required to serve a probationary period. (6) The following terms have specific meanings in this Policy: (7) An Academic Staff member, other than a casual staff member, may be required to satisfactorily complete a specified, reasonable period of probationary employment that is directly related to the nature of the work to be performed. The requirement to complete a probationary period will normally be a condition within an offer of continuing and fixed-term employment. (8) An Academic Staff member cannot normally be required to serve more than one period of probation. However, an Academic Staff member who has successfully completed the probationary requirements of a fixed-term appointment and who is subsequently offered a continuing academic appointment, may be required to serve a further period of up to eighteen (18) months’ probation. The additional probationary requirements for this continuing appointment will be set out in the University’s letter of offer, in accordance with this Policy. (9) The terms of an Academic Staff member’s probation will be advised in writing to the Academic staff member in advance of the commencement of employment via the letter of offer of employment. The terms will include the period of probation and the probation criteria which must be achieved during probation. The maximum period of probation for staff appointed on a continuing basis is three (3) years. (10) The performance of an Academic Staff member, including in relation to the achievement of probation criteria, will be monitored and managed during the probation period as part of the Progress Plan for Academic Staff process. Formal Probationary Reviews will be conducted as an extension of the Progress Plan feedback and development conversations. An Academic Staff member with a three (3) year probation period will normally have their performance reviewed on an annual basis with a final review concluding normally no later than three (3) months prior to the anticipated date of confirmation. (11) The potential outcomes during probation are normally as follows: (12) For the purposes of this Policy, unsatisfactory performance includes behaviour of a kind described in Regulation 1.07 of the Fair Work Act Regulations (refer to Attachment 4). (13) All approvals of decisions made must be in accordance with the relevant University Delegations of Authority Policy and Register. (14) Probation criteria set out the expectations that the Academic Staff member will need to meet in order to achieve confirmation of their continuing appointment. Probation criteria will include essential and specific probation criteria. (15) The probation criteria for continuing academic positions will normally be determined as part of the recruitment and selection process and advised to People and Capability via the relevant Appointment form in Staff Connect. (16) The period of probation of an Academic Staff member will be determined as part of the selection process based on the following options: (17) The recommended probation period will be confirmed in the relevant Appointment form in Staff Connect. (18) The approved probation criteria and period will be included in the letter of offer of employment to the Academic Staff member. Once the letter of offer containing the terms of probation is accepted by the Academic Staff member, it cannot be changed except through mutual agreement between the University and the staff member to a variation to the letter of offer. (19) A change to an Academic Staff member’s specific probation criteria may be appropriate following: (20) A period of leave, including parental leave and/or leave without pay, does not vary the probationary period specified in the letter of offer. (21) However, an increase to the period of probation could occur: (22) The following process will apply to changing the terms (criteria and/or period) of probation: (23) This process does not apply to the reduction of a period of probation which occurs as a result of: (24) During the period of probation, the Academic Staff member will participate in the ongoing Progress Plan for Academic Staff process. (25) Formal Probation Reviews will be conducted as an extension of the ongoing feedback and development conversations associated with the Progress Plan with performance reviewed on an annual basis and a Final Probation Review concluded normally no later than three (3) months prior to the anticipated date of confirmation. (26) The Progress Plan is continuous for the duration of employment. It commences at the time of appointment with the University. (27) Following commencement, Progress Plans conversations will begin between the Academic Staff member and nominated supervisor to: (28) The Progress Plan can be utilised to outline and record any development plans associated with the staff member’s probation. (29) In accordance with the Progress Plan for Academic Staff Policy, regular formal or informal conversations should occur between the nominated supervisor and the Academic Staff member. During these conversations any probation related concerns should be raised, discussed and documented. (30) Feedback and development conversations could consider: (31) If improvements are identified, or there is risk of the Academic Staff member not meeting probation criteria, the supervisor should inform the National Head of School (or equivalent) and the Executive Dean (or equivalent). The Executive Dean (or equivalent) may then take action in accordance with section 6.5, Managing unsatisfactory performance during probation. (32) A Formal Review of Probation will normally be conducted no later than six (6) months before the end of the probation period. (33) If the Academic Staff member’s performance consistently exceeds expectations and early confirmation is being considered, the Formal Review of Probation may be conducted at any time during the probation period. In these circumstances the recommendation is referred to by the Executive Dean (or equivalent) to a Probation Review Committee constituted in accordance with Attachment 3. If early confirmation is endorsed by the Probation Review Committee, the recommendation will be referred to the relevant member of the Senior Executive for decision. The Academic Staff member will be informed of this outcome in writing. (34) If an Academic Staff member is at risk of not achieving their probation criteria before or by the end of the probationary term and/or their performance has been assessed as being unsatisfactory, refer to section 6.5 (Managing unsatisfactory performance during probation) of this Policy, a Formal Review of Probation may be conducted (refer to 6.5.2). (35) For the purposes of a Formal Probation Review, the Academic Staff member and nominated supervisor will complete a Formal Probation Review Form. The Forms will be accompanied by supporting documents and the evidence specified on the Formal Probation Review Form and agreed as part of the probation criteria. (36) In circumstances where satisfactory progress towards or completion of a qualification is a probationary criterion, the Academic Staff member will be expected to provide evidence of their enrolment and progress (for example, a report from their research higher degree supervisor concerning progress and anticipated completion or evidence of submission of thesis). (37) The Academic Staff member may be required to give their permission for further information to be obtained directly from relevant officers within the institution in which the qualification is being undertaken, if requested to do so by the nominated supervisor. (38) The normal process for conducting the Formal Probation Review is represented in Attachments 1 and 2, and is summarised below: (39) The usual options for the Executive Dean (or equivalent) and the subsequent action required to complete the Formal Probation Review are summarised below. The options differ depending on whether the review is: (40) The Academic Staff member’s performance consistently exceeds expectations and early confirmation is recommended. In these circumstances the recommendation is referred to a Probation Review Committee by the Executive Dean (or equivalent). If early confirmation is endorsed by the Probation Review Committee, the recommendation will be referred to the relevant member of the Senior Executive for decision. The Academic Staff member will be informed of this outcome in writing. (41) The Academic Staff member is at risk of not achieving their probation criteria by the end of the probationary term and/or their performance has been assessed as being unsatisfactory. In such circumstances, refer to section 6.5 (Managing unsatisfactory performance during probation) of this Policy. (42) The Academic Staff member’s performance and progress is satisfactory and probation should continue. The Academic Staff member will be informed of this outcome in writing. The Final Probation Review will occur before the of probation. (43) The Academic Staff member’s performance is satisfactory and confirmation is recommended. The recommendation is referred to the relevant member of the Senior Executive for approval. The Academic Staff member will be informed of this outcome in writing. (44) The Academic Staff member’s performance is unsatisfactory and non-confirmation of their appointment is recommended. This recommendation may be referred to the Probation Review Committee for review. Refer to section 6.5 (Managing unsatisfactory performance during probation) of this Policy. (45) Refer to Attachment 3 for further information in relation to the composition and role of the Probation Review Committee. (46) Nothing in this Policy prevents the member of the Senior Executive from, in exceptional circumstances, considering other outcomes of the probation process which may be recommended by the Executive Dean (or equivalent) and/or a Probation Review Committee. (47) At any time during the probation period, a nominated supervisor may form the view that the performance of an Academic Staff member who is serving a probationary period: (48) The ongoing Progress Plan feedback and development conversations and/or Formal Probation Review(s) provide the nominated supervisor with opportunities to: (49) The staff member will be made aware of any significant performance concerns through any actions taken by the nominated supervisor to defer or withhold incremental progression, in accordance with the Incremental Progression for Academic Staff Policy. (50) Where a review of performance finds that earlier action to address the unsatisfactory performance has not achieved satisfactory performance, the nominated supervisor will bring this to the attention of the Executive Dean (or equivalent) and Chief People Officer and action will be taken in accordance with one of the following options. (51) If the unsatisfactory performance (including any consideration that the academic staff member’s behaviour has been in breach of Regulation 1.07 of the Act) is such that separation of employment before the end of the probation period is considered appropriate, the matter may be referred to the relevant member of the Senior Executive for appropriate action in accordance with the Agreement. (52) If the staff member is at risk of not meeting their probation criteria and/or the unsatisfactory performance has been identified through the probation process, the Executive Dean (or equivalent) may seek further consideration and advice from the Probation Review Committee as part of a Formal Probation Review. (53) Outcomes from the consideration of the Probation Review Committee will normally include the following (depending on the timing of the Formal Probation Review): (54) Where the Probation Review Committee endorses a recommendation of non-confirmation, the Executive Dean (or equivalent) will refer this to the relevant member of the Senior Executive for consideration of the recommendation for separation of employment in accordance with the Agreement. (55) Where the Probation Review Committee provides feedback on areas of performance and development for the Academic Staff member to address, this feedback is communicated to the Academic Staff member by the nominated supervisor and/or Nat HOS (or equivalent) and/or Executive Dean (or equivalent). (56) The outcomes of the managing for performance process include: (57) The Probation Review Committee may endorse a recommendation for confirmation of appointment and this is referred to the relevant member of the Senior Executive. The Academic Staff member will be informed of this outcome in writing. (58) Where the Probation Review Committee endorses a recommendation for the non-confirmation of appointment on the basis of unsatisfactory performance and/or behaviour, the Executive Dean (or equivalent) will refer this to the relevant member of the Senior Executive for appropriate action in accordance with the Agreement. (59) The University may make changes to this policy and procedures from time to time. In this regard, any staff member who wishes to make any comments about this policy may forward their suggestions to People and Capability. (60) Any staff member who requires assistance in understanding this policy should first consult their nominated supervisor who is responsible for the implementation and operation of these arrangements in their work area. Should further information or advice be required staff should visit Service Central.Probation for Continuing Academic Staff Policy
Section 1 - Background Information
Section 2 - Application of Policy
Section 3 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 4 - Policy Statement
Section 5 - Approvals
Section 6 - Procedures
6.1 Probation Criteria
6.2 Probation Period
6.3 Changing probation terms during the period of probation
6.4 Probation Feedback and Reviews – Progress Plan and Formal Probation Reviews
6.4.1 Progress Plan process during Probation
Initiating Progress Plan discussions
Ongoing Progress Plan feedback and development conversations
6.4.2 Formal Probation Reviews
Timing of Formal Probation Review
Documentation for a Formal Probation Review
Process for Formal Probation Reviews
Formal Probation Review during probation
Final Probation Review
6.5 Managing unsatisfactory performance during probation
6.5.1 Remedial action to address unsatisfactory performance
6.5.2 Continued Unsatisfactory Performance
Referral to the relevant member of the Senior Executive
Referral to the Probation Review Committee as part of a Formal Probation Review
Formal Probation Review during probation
Final Probation Review
Section 7 - Revisions made to this Policy
Section 8 - Further Assistance
View Document
This is the current version of this document. To view historic versions, click the link in the document's navigation bar.
Continuing academic staff appointed before 9 February 2023 may have a maximum period of probation of up to five (5) years. These staff may apply for confirmation before the end of their period of probation in accordance with section 6.3 of this Policy to change to their terms of probation, or request for approval of early confirmation to align with the 3 year probation period as per clause of the ACU Staff Enterprise Agreement 2022-2025.
An Academic Staff member engaged on a second or subsequent fixed-term appointment with the University cannot be required to serve a probationary period (refer to section 3).
The Capability Development Framework can assist in identifying professional development needs.
In addition, the matter may be referred to a Probation Review Committee based on particular procedural requirements for probation reviews within the staff member’s the letter of offer of employment.