(1) This procedure is governed by the Position Classification for Professional Staff Policy and applies to all Professional Staff positions up to an including Level 10. (2) This Procedure informs Professional Staff and Nominated Supervisors of the process for classifying Professional Staff positions at ACU utilising the Position Review Request via Staff Connect. (3) Professional Staff position descriptions should normally undergo a classification review when: (4) Classification review is not necessary for changes the Nominated Supervisor considers are not significant, and do not impact on the nature of the role or the level at which it is expected to operate. (5) Position descriptions that require minor changes to the role are to be submitted on the Position Review Request in Staff Connect with ‘Updated Documentation’ chosen as the review purpose. (6) If the changes appear to warrant a classification, once the Position Review Request is received by People and Capability, the changes will be discussed with the Nominated Supervisor, before undertaking a classification review. (7) All requests for classification of a position must be completed on the Position Review Request in Staff Connect, with approval by the appropriate delegated officer and submitted to People and Capability. (8) When considering whether an existing position needs to be classified, Nominated Supervisors should consider whether the changes are significant and impact on the expected level at which the position is operating. (9) Classification is not appropriate: (10) Other forms of reward and recognition may be available. Further information can be accessed via the Rewards and Recognition webpage and via Service Central. (11) A Professional Staff member may submit a request for their position classification to be reviewed directly by People and Capability. It is the normal expectation that an application for a classification review should have undergone consultation between the Nominated Supervisor and the staff member. (12) Where a staff member has submitted a position classification request without consulting their Nominated Supervisor, People and Capability will: (13) People and Capability will seek to first enable a discussion with the Nominated Supervisor and the staff member to ascertain the accuracy of the context and come to an agreement regarding the content of the request submitted by the staff member. (14) Where agreement is not reached, People and Capability will undertake a classification review. In order that a fair and equitable decision is made relevant additional documentation will be sought from both the staff member and the Nominated Supervisor. (15) The staff member will submit a Position Review request vis Staff Connect and provide: (16) The Nominated Supervisor will provide: (17) People and Capability will classify the position based on the material submitted. (18) A staff member or supervisor can request a further review of the classification outcome. A review of the classification outcome will be undertaken by a Classification Review Subgroup which meets on an as-needed basis. (19) If a consensus outcome cannot be reached by the Classification Review Subgroup, the classification review will be referred to the Classification Review Committee that meets four times a year. (20) Positions will be classified using DWM (primary) and where necessary Hay (secondary) classification methodologies. (21) All classification reviews will be undertaken on an as needs basis by a member of People and Capability in the first instance. (22) Changes to the position description may be recommended by People and Capability as part of the classification process. (23) Once a decision has been made by People and Capability on the classification outcome, no additional information provided after this can be considered. Any additional information must be submitted as part of a new request for classification. (24) A staff member, Union, or Supervisor can request a review of the classification outcome undertaken by People and Capability. A review of the classification outcome is undertaken by a Classification Review Subgroup which meets on an as-needed basis. (25) If a consensus outcome cannot be reached by the Classification Review Subgroup using the primary and secondary descriptors, the classification review will be referred to the Classification Review Committee which meets up to four times per year. (26) A staff member cannot participate in a Classification Review Subgroup/Committee while a position in their own functional unit, their own position, or a position they directly supervise, is being evaluated. (27) The Classification Review Subgroup/Committee may contact the Nominated Supervisor of the position and where relevant both the Nominated Supervisor and the staff member together. (28) The database of all position classifications will be updated on a regular basis and will normally be provided to all members of the Classification Review Committee up to four times per year. (29) People and Capability will advise the Member of the Executive, Nominated Supervisor and the staff member of the classification outcome in writing. People and Capability will be available for discussion on the outcome of the review. (30) The date of effect for all classification decisions will be the date on which the role was classified. (31) A staff member may appeal an unsuccessful application for classification review of their position in accordance with the Staff Appeals Policy. (32) The staff member may only appeal a classification outcome on the grounds that a breach of procedure occurred which materially affected the decision on the classification outcome. (33) The revision table includes revisions up until this document was migrated into the current policy platform. Any later changes will show in the Status and Details tab. (34) The University may make changes to this Procedure from time to time to improve the effectiveness of its operation. In this regard, any staff member who wishes to make any comments about these procedures may forward their suggestions to People and Capability. (35) Any staff member who requires assistance in understanding this policy should first consult their Nominated Supervisor who is responsible for the implementation and operation of these arrangements in their work area. Should further information or advice be required staff should visit Service Central. (36) For related legislation, policies, procedures and guidelines and any supporting resources please refer to the Associated Information tab.Position Classification for Professional Staff Procedure
Section 1 - Governing Policy
Section 2 - Purpose
Section 3 - When to review Position Descriptions for classification
Top of PageSection 4 - Updated Positions Descriptions
Section 5 - Requests for Classification Review
Section 6 - Requests for Classification of an Existing Position
Section 7 - Staff Initiated Requests
Section 8 - Classification Process
Section 9 - Effective Date of Classification
Section 10 - Appeals
Section 11 - Revisions Made to This Procedure
Date
Major, Minor or Editorial
Description
1 July 2019
Major
Updated to incorporate provisions of ACU Staff Enterprse Agreement 2017-2021.
20 January 2021
Minor
Updated in relation to paper based PCR to Aurion online.
Section 12 - Further Assistance
Section 13 - Associated Information
View Document
This is the current version of this document. You can provide feedback on this document to the document author - refer to the Status and Details on the document's navigation bar.